Let's examine the lunacy of Obama's statement:
"And I do believe for folks like me who have worked hard, but frankly also been lucky, I don't mind paying just a little bit more than the waitress that I just met over there who's things are slow and she can barely make the rent. Because my attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody."
"If you've got a plumbing business, you're going to be better off if you've got a whole bunch of customers who can afford to hire you, and right now I think everybody's so pinched that business is bad for everybody and I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody. "
So let me understand this. Obama wants to take money from Joe's plumbing business so that the government can give it to the waitress down the street, so that the waitress can then call up the plumber and give it back to him?
Ummm... Why not just let Joe keep the money in the first place?
Answer: Because then the government wouldn't be able to siphon off 20% of it to pay for more government employees hired via its' racist affirmative action policies.
In response to: Joe The Plumber Admits He Wasn't Undecided After All